Home Pagan symbols & customs Site search
Wedding customs Veil Rings Kiss
Crosses Fish Candles Calendar Good luck!

Google
 

Superstition

"The root of all superstition is that men observe when a thing hits, but not when it misses."

Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
English Lawyer and Philosopher



It's bad luck to be superstitious

Paradoxically, it is reasonable to be superstitious even though superstitions are not based on reason.

Classical decision theory, not to mention common sense, says we believe a superstition if the cost of believing is less than the cost of missing a real association. For example, don't walk under a ladder since the cost, in terms of effort to walk a little bit further around the ladder, is lower than the cost of replacing your head if a roofing tile falls on it.

Make the sign of the cross if a black cat crosses your path1, since these are shape shifters and familiars of evil spirits and curl up like snakes on the hearths of witches. If you ignore this advice you could succumb to a fatal illness.

Well, certainly if a cat walks across your food preparation area, you increase the risk of having gastric ulcers (from helicobacter pylori - a sort of tiny helicopter flown by a demented bacterium). Fleas are enough justification for avoiding cats, whatever the colour, but cats can cause much more harm than those tiny itchy little blood-suckers. Cats can be the source of ringworm, campylobacter (bacteria in a tent), streptococcus (causing you to strip to your coccyx), salmonella (sounds fishy) and rabies; none of which are very nice. They can cause conjunctivitis, tonsillitis, pharyngitis, toxoplasmosis... the scary list goes on. (See http://www.messybeast.com/zoonoses.htm for a fuller list of nasties.)

So it make sense to avoid all cats; not just black cats that cross your path.

Ridiculous superstition

Less understandable, however, are superstitions such as the old Aztec custom to sustain the Universe. Every three weeks, these Mesoamericans dragged victims to the top of a pyramid/temple, sliced open their chests and held up the still-beating heart to the gods.

This was less to do with common sense and more to do with bullying by the tribal leadership, keeping the people in line by spinning them a horror story. The 2004 movie 'The Village' shows a good modern example of this. The 2003 invasion for Iraq's Weapons Of Mass Destruction is another. We know better now2.

There are many instances of Church leaders being guilty of similar bullying.

"The religious superstition is encouraged by means of the institution of churches, processions, monuments, festivities... The so-called clergy stupefy the masses... They befog the people and keep them in an eternal condition of stupefaction"

Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy (1828-1910)
Russian writer and philosopher

Religious superstition

But take care not to confuse religion as just a turbo-charged superstition. A superstition could paint itself pink and do freestyle break-dancing like a mad mongoose, singing "Billions of people follow me. Therefore I'm a religion!" But it would still be a humble superstition.

What is the strongest superstition you can think of? How has it, or any other superstition, benefited mankind? What superstition has ever changed somebody's life? (apart from the Aztec victim, of course.) What superstition has touched the soul?

Superstition is not based on reason but relies on a trust in chance or an irrational fear of what is unknown or mysterious. The cornerstone of religion is love and a trust in Divine Power. There are superstitions within religion of course, but religion is not merely a glorified superstition; it is a consciousness of our personal relationship with the infinite.

"Superstition is to religion what astrology is to astronomy: the mad daughter of a wise mother"

Francois Marie Arouet Voltaire (1694-1778)
French writer and philosopher

Pragmatic superstition

As humans, we recognise patterns, connect the dots and create meaning from what we see or what we think we see. And when we are not sure if what we see is real, we can be influenced by suggestion from others in a more powerful position, even though there is a cost to us.

Having said that, as mankind's intelligence develops, as our lives become less threatened by natural woes, the need for superstitious beliefs is less beneficial than in the past. This doesn't mean superstitions are groundless and that it's only a matter of time before they become obsolete. Superstition will be a human trait for many more generations yet.


Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)

Although religion and superstition are different, the logic of following superstitions (as explained at the top of this page), can also be applied to religion.

Blaise Pascal argued that one should believe in God, even if you assume there is no God. The potential benefits of belief make betting on theism rational. Belief offers the believer comfort on Earth and everlasting life in Heaven. There are, of course, far better reasons and a far more convincing basis for faith in God's existence, but Pascal's Wager3 should give enough for any intelligent skeptic to consider, even though such consideration will not likely lead to belief.

As part of man's evolution, the superstitions which developed alchemy resulted in the powerful science we understand and use to our benefit today. Science has superseded many things which were the realm of religion in days gone by.

Science has been able to prove many of its theories, but has not disproved superstition (or religion). Scientists may scoff at superstition, but have they ever tested it? Has anyone produced statistics or even studied the incidence of good fortune experienced by people who keep a rabbit's foot under their pillow or a horseshoe on their doorpost, compared with people who break a mirror without throwing salt over their shoulder? Or have scientists just dismissed the whole thing as bunkum without trying to prove it's bunkum. Now that's not very scientific, is it?

As already mentioned, science has superseded many superstitious and religious ideas (see for example Why the church doesn't like female priests.) Yet there are still imponderables (the wonder of consciousness, for example) which help sustain the need for humans to have beliefs beyond those that science can prove.


1 : If you live in Germany, it's good luck if the cat crosses from your left to your right, and bad luck if it's the other way. (Apparently it's something to do with moving from the evil 'left' to the righteous 'right'. See Right On!) And there's no point in trying to cheat fate by quickly turning round, since fate is fixed. Unless you don't believe that fate is a done deal. But in that case, you probably don't believe in unlucky cat crossings anyway.

2 : "There are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know." (Donald Rumsfeld at a Defense Department Briefing on February 12, 2002, helping to convince the world of the necessity to invade Iraq.)

3 : The 17th century French scientist Blaise Pascal, who invented a forerunner to computer engineering, set forth a formal theory of probability. One argument became known as 'The Pascal Wager': What do you risk by having the belief that there is a God? If there is no God and you live as if there were, you have risked nothing and lost nothing. Likewise, if God really does exist but you live as if He didn't, consider what you risk losing. Which is the safer risk?

If I wager for, and God is, then I benefit from infinite gain;
If I wager for, and God is not, then I suffer no loss.
If I wager against, and God is, then I suffer infinite loss;
If I wager against, and God is not, then I have neither loss nor gain.

See also What is luck?


Google